Outlining

Research Papers, Reports, Theses
 

Outlining the Paper

Some researchers begin with a tentative, or working, outline that guides the choice of research materials; others let the outline grow from their research and writing.  If you develop an outline in advance, it should remain open to change as you read and take notes.  Formulating and revising an outline throughout the process of researching and writing can help you give your paper a logical and meaningful structure.  After you have written a draft of your paper, you should either check it against an existing outline or attempt to make an outline from the draft.

Creating a final outline involves making decisions about the thesis statement, the principle of organization, the type of outline, and the format of the outline.

·   Types of Outlines

Your working outline may consist of casual jottings, but the outline you present to your instructor either in the middle of your research or with your final paper should be formal and consistently developed.  You may choose either a topic outline or a sentence outline, depending on your preference and that of your instructor. 

TOPIC OUTLINE            The entries in a topic outline are words, phrases, or clauses: they are not complete sentences.  The entries should be parallel; they all should take the same grammatical form.  It you use a noun phrase for one entry, you should continue using noun phrases consistently.  You may have to rework some of your entries to make them parallel, but paying attention to grammatical form often leads to clear and logical thinking. 

SENTENCE OUTLINE            The entries in a sentence outline are complete sentences.  The process of writing a research paper involves writing sentences from the topics in the topic outline, in effect producing a sentence outline.  A sentence outline therefore serves as a beginning for the paper and as a test of the logic of the outline. 

·   Outline Formats

The two basic formats for an outline are the number-letter sequence and the decimal pattern.  The number-letter sequence is shown in the following example: 

I.            The two reasons for…

A.            The first reason…

1.            The women…

a.            They could…

(1)            The time…

(a)            The technology…

i)            The latest development…

ii)            The plans for…

(b)            The receptive public…

(2)            The place…

b.            They could…

2.            The men…

B.            The second reason…

II.            The reasons against…  

 

The sequence for a decimal outline proceeds as follows: 

1.            The two reasons for…

1.1         The first reason…

1.1.1            The women…

1.1.1.1            They could...

1.1.1.1.1            The time…

1.1.1.1.2            The receptive public…

1.1.1.2            They could…

1.1.2            The men…

1.2         The second reason…

2.            The reasons against…

With either format, logic requires that there be at least two items at each level or subdivision; that is; an A must not appear without a B and a 1.1.1 must not appear without a 1.1.2 because nothing can be divided into fewer than two parts.  When you have only one subdivision for a section, you should either restate the major heading to include the subdivision or search for another logical division for the heading.

Parallelism

Elements in an outline or list, as well as chapter titles, subtitles, and headings should be parallel – that is, they should take the same grammatical form.  If you use a noun or noun phrase (such as “Effective Regulations”) for one chapter title, the next chapter title should also be a noun phrase (“Adequate Screening” rather than, for example, “To Provide Adequate Screening,” an infinitive phrase).  Similarly, in a sentence outline, all entries must be complete sentences.

The entries in the following outline are not parallel.  Entry I is a complete sentence.  Entry I.A is a noun phrase.  Entry I.B is a participial phrase.
 

Topic Outline with nonparallel entries

I.            Nuclear Opponents Cite Dangers

A.            Nuclear Accidents Involving Leakage

B.            Disposing of Nuclear Waste

C.            Groups That Threaten Sabotage

II.            Protecting Against Nuclear Accidents

A.            Sound Design and Construction

B.            Monitoring Systems

C.            Automatic Devices for Correcting Problems  

Topic Outline with parallel entries

The entries in the following outline are parallel; they are all noun phrases: 

I.            Dangers of Nuclear Power Plants

A.            Leakage of Radiation

B.            Disposal of Nuclear Waste

C.            Sabotage by Terrorist Groups

II.            Safety Features of Nuclear Power Plants

A.            Sound Design and Construction

B.            Monitoring Systems

C.            Automatic Correction Devices

You may use other constructions in an outline as long as each entry takes the same form.  In the next outline, each entry is a complete sentence.

   

Sentence outline

I.            Emerson expounded a political theory close to anarchism.

A.            He believed that individuals should govern themselves.

B.            He believed that the state should not be concerned with property.

II.            Emerson disapproved of the educational system.

A.            He found fault with methods of instruction.

B.            He criticized the curriculum.

III.            Emerson sought to abolish established religion.

·   Logical Consistency

The requirement for parallelism is not exclusively a grammatical one, but a logical one as well.  Grammatical inconsistencies often signal problems in logic.  Logical consistency requires headings at the same level of an outline to have approximately equivalent importance and to refer to similar categories of ideas.  For example, three headings designating historical periods and a fourth at the same level designating procedural difficulties would not be logically consistent.  Moreover, each heading at a given level should represent the same degree of generalization and refer to approximately the same kind of information.  The following set of headings is logically unbalanced:

Outline without parallel logic

I.            U.S. secondary schools during the nineteenth century

II.            Changes in secondary school programs in Pennsylvania from 1890 to 1930

III.            Nature of secondary school curricular changes from 1930 to 1970

IV.            Percentages of teenagers enrolled in high schools

The fourth heading is considerably narrower in focus than the others and calls for purely statistical information rather than interpretation.  In addition, the scope of the inquiry changes from national in the first heading to local in the second.

 

Home | Handouts and Worksheets | Writing Advice | Bibliography Formats | Research Tools
Regents Exam | Videos | Dept. of Writing and Linguistics | GSU | Links | E-mail Us!

This page is maintained by the Georgia Southern University Writing Center
Please send comments and corrections to the webmaster.
This page last updated on 2/06/03.